Editorial Feature

Flow Batteries Could be a Game Changer for Electric Cars

Image Credits: Bildagentur Zoonar GmbH/shutterstock.com

Energy consumption is at an all-time high, but stores of fossil fuels are diminishing. The switch to renewable energy is fundamental to not only protecting our planet from harmful emissions but to maintaining the energy dependant societies that we live in. The adoption of electric cars is offering a route to switching from fossil fuels to renewables in one of the most energy-consuming sectors. However, in addition to debates over affordability, there are two main barriers preventing widespread adoption.

Currently, electric cars require access to charge points to power up. These charge points, while increasing in number, are certainly not as available as conventional gas stations. Current charge time also significantly surpasses the amount of time it takes to fill up a combustion-engine powered car. Drivers are required to wait for anything from 30 minutes up to several hours to charge their vehicles, making them far less convenient. In addition, there are concerns over ‘range anxiety’, where potential electric car owners are nervous to make the shift from their fossil-fueled vehicles because long journeys would require more frequent power charges than they would have to make gas refills. Consumers are concerned about the fuel economy and performance of electric cars in comparison to combustion-engine cars. To encourage more people to make the switch, confidence in both usability and performance is fundamental.

Importance of Flow Batteries

The flow battery presents an industry game-changer. Significant enough to get consumers over the hump and facilitate widespread adoption of electric cars. Chemists based at Glasgow University have utilized a nano-molecule that has the capability of storing electric power or hydrogen gas in its new flow battery system. Instead of visiting charge points, cars could theoretically fill up at a gas station, as the system works on replacing fluid within the battery. An electric car owner would use the pumps to fill the battery with fresh electrolyte instead of the usual fossil fuel that is pumped into combustion engines, and the depleted electrolyte would be discarded at the same time. This means that no change to the infrastructure is required and current gas stations could be used to support electric vehicles, eliminating the concern over ease of use due to limited charge points.

Further to this, the new system eliminates the concern over the need to wait significant periods to charge the vehicle which causes delays to journeys and make the cars less convenient. As the energy is replaced through changing the electrolyte by pumping it directly into the system, recharge time is dramatically cut, meaning that filling up a regular car and recharging an electric one would take a similar time with the flow battery.

Next, the fluid that releases power as both electricity or as hydrogen has the capacity to power the car for up to 3,000 miles, according to the latest tests. This has the impact of eliminating ‘range anxiety’ as a factor for not deciding to switch to electric. Tests have shown that with the new battery, drivers would be replacing the fluid with about the same frequency that they would refill a conventional car.

Conclusion

With the flow battery concerns over the usability and performance of electric cars are alleviated. Because the system allows the fresh charge to be pumped directly into the system the current infrastructure can be used to support recharging, the time of which is reduced to the same as refueling a combustion engine car. The new battery system also supports a greater amount of energy storage, meaning that cars can travel further without needing to recharge. The impact of this is that two of the main preventions of the widespread adoption of electric cars are eliminated, assisting the uptake of a renewable alternative in one of the world’s biggest fossil fuel consuming sectors.

Sources and Further Reading

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Sarah Moore

Written by

Sarah Moore

After studying Psychology and then Neuroscience, Sarah quickly found her enjoyment for researching and writing research papers; turning to a passion to connect ideas with people through writing.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Moore, Sarah. (2019, August 27). Flow Batteries Could be a Game Changer for Electric Cars. AZoCleantech. Retrieved on November 18, 2019 from https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=923.

  • MLA

    Moore, Sarah. "Flow Batteries Could be a Game Changer for Electric Cars". AZoCleantech. 18 November 2019. <https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=923>.

  • Chicago

    Moore, Sarah. "Flow Batteries Could be a Game Changer for Electric Cars". AZoCleantech. https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=923. (accessed November 18, 2019).

  • Harvard

    Moore, Sarah. 2019. Flow Batteries Could be a Game Changer for Electric Cars. AZoCleantech, viewed 18 November 2019, https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=923.

Comments

  1. Tyler Fawkes Tyler Fawkes United States says:

    Flow batteries have some serious hurdles to overcome. First, the current generation of flow batteries need to replace the cathode approximately every 5000 miles. I have yet to see the actual, accurate cost for that published anywhere. Second, the fresh electrolyte must be delivered to the filling station somehow. The spent electrolyte must also be collected and and recycled/recharged. That requires a fleet of tanker trucks running  on who knows what to keep stations supplied. The current petrol delivery infrastructure is one-way. From refinery to distributor to filling station. So the flow system would require filling stations to reserve current tank capacity or add tank capacity for storing spent electrolyte. Many stations, especially in urban areas, just don't have the space to do that. Also consider the need for delivery trucks to turn around once empty and collect spent electrolyte on their return trip to the fuel depot. A fleet of trucks running around in circles is far less efficient and much worse for the environment than simply running electrical cables. Finally there is the question of the electrolyte itself. Assuming recharging electrolyte is equally environmentally friendly as charging a battery, what is the environmental impact of it's manufacture and disposal compared to batteries. Keep in mind the R&D money being spent on solid state, and non-lithium based batteries vs R&D money invested in flow technology. I just don't think flow can beat solid state and super capacitors to the market. Flow batteries do make better sense than fuel cells though, especially for large, long-haul commercial trucking.

  2. Allan Høj Allan Høj Denmark says:

    Well it is always like this.... No fact
    What is the approximate price pr. Wh ?
    What is the lifetime of the "cell" ?
    What is the power density on the "cell", weight and size vs Wh ?
    Is it possible to recycle ?
    what is the approximate cost pr. charge ?
    Regarding cars, this question should always be in an article, if not it is just hot air !

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoCleantech.com.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit