Tackling Methane Emissions: Top Sources and Emerging Solutions

By Abdul Ahad NazakatReviewed by Lauren HardakerAug 25 2025

Methane (CH4) is a major contributor to climate change, accounting for about 30% of global warming since the Industrial Revolution.^[¹^] Over 100 years, its warming effect is 25–30 times greater than that of carbon dioxide; over 20 years, it can be up to 80 times stronger.^[¹^] 

Image credit: Quality Stock Arts/Shutterstock.com

Unlike carbon dioxide, which remains in the atmosphere for centuries, methane breaks down within 9–12 years. This shorter lifetime means reducing methane emissions can deliver relatively quick climate benefits. To stay on track for limiting warming to 1.5°C, reducing methane emissions from fossil fuels by 75% by 2030 is essential.^[2]

The Scale of the Challenge

Global methane emissions from human activities reached approximately 380 million tons in 2023, rising despite mitigation efforts.^[2] Annual emissions have increased by almost 10% over the past two decades, driven primarily by agriculture and the gas industry.^[3] Large methane emission events detected by satellites rose by more than 50% in 2023 compared to 2022, with over 5 million tons detected from major fossil fuel leaks worldwide.^[2]

Top Three Sources of Methane Emissions

1. Agriculture: The Leading Contributor

Agriculture represents the largest anthropogenic source of methane globally, emitting approximately 145 Tg CH4 per year, roughly double the emissions from fossil fuels.^[4] This sector's methane production occurs through three primary mechanisms that release methane through distinct biological processes.

Enteric Fermentation in Livestock

The most significant source within agriculture is enteric fermentation in ruminant animals.^[5] In the rumen, methanogenic archaea produce methane as a byproduct of anaerobic digestion. During ruminal fermentation, microorganisms break down organic matter, producing volatile fatty acids, CO2, and hydrogen. Methanogenic bacteria then utilize these fermentation products through the reaction:

CO2 + 4H2 → CH4 + 2H2O.

Manure Management Systems

Manure storage contributes significantly to total emissions from dairy operations. Research indicates that manure storage can account for 8.2% to 15.4% of total methane emissions after 7 and 14 weeks of storage, respectively.^[6] Biogenic emissions from animal manure are stimulated by the degradation of volatile solids under anaerobic conditions, with emission rates varying dramatically across different management systems and climatic conditions.^[7]

Rice Cultivation

Flooded rice paddies represent a significant but often underemphasized agricultural source of methane. Anaerobic conditions in submerged soils promote methanogenesis, with global emissions estimated at 30-40 Tg CH₄ annually. Intermittent irrigation, mid-season drainage, and alternative wetting and drying (AWD) practices have been shown to cut methane emissions by 30-70% without reducing yields.^[16,17]

2. Fossil Fuel Operations: Hidden Emissions

The fossil fuel sector represents the second-largest source, with the IEA estimating nearly 120 million tons of methane emissions from fossil fuel production and use in 2023.^[2] This sector offers the most significant potential for rapid, cost-effective reductions.

Oil and Gas Extraction

Oil and gas operations contribute approximately 80 million tons of methane emissions annually from the top 10 emitting countries alone.^[2] Key emission sources include venting and flaring due to insufficient infrastructure, fugitive emissions from equipment leaks, and temporary emissions during well completions and maintenance operations. Recent measurement-based studies reveal that emissions are approximately 2 times greater than EPA estimates, with a mean gas-production-normalized methane loss rate of 2.6%.^[8]

Coal Mining Operations

Coal mining contributes significantly through methane released during extraction from underground operations, emissions from exposed coal seams in surface mining, and continued emissions from abandoned mines.^[9] China represents by far the highest emitter in the coal sector globally.^[2]

Infrastructure Leakage

Methane leakage from infrastructure represents a critical challenge. In Canada, wellbore emissions range from 23 to 176 kt of methane annually, representing 1.7-11.4% of upstream sector emissions.^[9] Abandoned and orphaned wells present a growing concern, with approximately 120,000 documented orphaned wells in the United States and potentially up to one million undocumented wells.^[10]

3. Waste Management: Decomposition and Treatment

The waste sector encompasses solid waste management in landfills and wastewater treatment processes, representing the third major source of anthropogenic methane emissions.

Landfill Methane Generation

Landfills generate methane through anaerobic decomposition of organic waste materials. Studies show methane generation rising from about 1.5 million cubic meters in 2010 to over 8.5 million in 2020 at individual facilities.^[11] The direct correlation between waste quantity and methane generation highlights significant potential for energy conversion.

Wastewater Treatment Emissions

Municipal wastewater treatment contributes through anaerobic digestion processes, collection systems under anaerobic conditions, and biosolids management.^[12] Research shows methane emissions from wastewater treatment can exceed CO2 emissions related to direct and indirect fossil fuel consumption for energy requirements.

Industry Solutions and Emerging Technologies

Agricultural Innovations

Feed Additives and Nutritional Interventions

Recent advances have led to antimethanogenic feed additives (AMFA) that reduce enteric methane through various mechanisms.^[13] Direct methanogenesis inhibitors like 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) target key enzymes in the methanogenesis pathway. Research demonstrates that methane emission per kg of milk was significantly lower with lauric acid supplementation (11.4 g) than with stearic acid (14.0 g).^[6]

Emerging approaches also include breeding cattle with naturally lower methane yield traits and inoculating livestock with methanotrophic microbes to redirect hydrogen flux away from methane production.^[17,18]

Advanced Manure Management

Anaerobic digestion of slurry and organic waste produces methane at the expense of volatile solids, with models predicting a 90% reduction of CH4 emissions from outside stores with digested slurry.^[7] Technologies include covered lagoons with gas capture, anaerobic digesters for energy production, and precision application systems.

Rice Cultivation Mitigation

Mitigation strategies for rice include AWD irrigation, direct seeding instead of transplanting, and soil amendments such as biochar or sulfate fertilizers, which suppress methanogenic activity.^[16] These practices not only reduce methane but can also improve water-use efficiency.

Fossil Fuel Sector Solutions

Leak Detection and Repair Technologies

Smart Leak Detection systems using Optical Gas Imaging (OGI) cameras enable reliable, accurate, and autonomous methane leak identification in real-time.^[14] Emerging technologies include Quantitative OGI (QOGI) for rapid leak rate estimation, satellite monitoring for wide-area coverage, and Computational Pipeline Monitoring using physics-based models.

Economic Methane Capture

About 40% of current methane emissions from fossil fuels could be eliminated at no net cost, since the savings from capturing and selling the recovered methane would outweigh the expenses of implementing abatement measures.^[2] Examples of such technologies include vapor recovery units, green completions for well operations, and upgrades to compressor stations.

Waste Sector Innovations

Landfill Gas Capture Systems

Modern landfill gas collection systems can capture 75-85% of generated methane for beneficial use or destruction. The potential for energy generation is substantial, with studies showing the electrical energy production potential of 248.067 kW/day from individual facilities.^[11] Additional approaches under development include biochar application to landfill covers to oxidize methane via methanotrophic bacteria, and engineered biocovers are designed to biologically filter emissions.^[19]

Circular Economy Approaches

The wastewater circular economy presents a paradigm balancing environment, economy, and society through integrated resource recovery. Research demonstrates that improving wastewater system circularity results in carbon footprint reductions of two-thirds and eutrophication reductions of 41%.^[15]

Economic Considerations and Implementation

Achieving a 75% reduction in methane emissions from fossil fuels by 2030 would require about USD 170 billion in investment, less than 5% of the fossil fuel industry’s 2023 revenues. From an economic perspective, the case is strong: most available methane abatement measures in the sector would be cost-effective if emissions were priced at around USD 20 per ton of CO2-equivalent.^[2]

Conclusion

Methane emissions represent a critical climate challenge and an immediate opportunity for meaningful action. Success requires coordinated efforts across governments, industry, and financial institutions, supported by enhanced monitoring, transparent reporting, and adequate financing mechanisms. With the right combination of policies, technologies, and investments, achieving the deep methane reductions necessary for climate stabilization is both technically feasible and economically viable.

Download your PDF copy now!

References

1. Rosenbaum, W. A. (2024). "Methane Reduction". In Elgar Encyclopedia of Climate Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Aug 25, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802209204.ch65
2. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Global methane tracker 2024 – Analysis. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-methane-tracker-2024
3. Schiermeier, Q. (2020). Global methane levels soar to record high. Nature, 583(7816), 318–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/D41586-020-02116-8
4. Smith, P., & Reay, D. (2021). Agricultural methane emissions and the potential for mitigation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2210). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0451
5. Klevenhusen, F., Kreuzer, M., & Soliva, C. R. (2011). Enteric and manure-derived methane and nitrogen emissions as well as metabolic energy losses in cows fed balanced diets based on maize, barley or grass hay. Animal, 5(3), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110001795
6. Külling, D. R., Menzi, H., Kröber, T. F., Neftel, A., Sutter, F., Lischer, P., & Kreuzer, M. (2002). Methane emissions of differently fed dairy cows and corresponding methane and nitrogen emissions from their manure during storage. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 79(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020248700255
7. Sommer, S. G., Petersen, S. O., & Møller, H. B. (2004). Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 69(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000029678.25083.FA
8. Omara, M., Himmelberger, A., MacKay, K., Williams, J. P., Benmergui, J., Sargent, M., Wofsy, S. C., & Gautam, R. (2024). Constructing a measurement-based spatially explicit inventory of US oil and gas methane emissions (2021). Earth System Science Data, 16(9), 3973–3991. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3973-2024
9. Seymour, S. P., Xie, D., & Kang, M. (2024). Highly uncertain methane leakage from oil and gas wells in Canada despite measurement and reporting. Energy & Fuels. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00908
10. Gianoutsos, N. J., Haase, K., & Birdwell, J. E. (2024). Geologic sources and well integrity impact methane emissions from orphaned and abandoned oil and gas wells. Science of The Total Environment, 912, 169584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169584
11. Ramírez Ríos, L. F., Becerra, D., & Ortega-Contreras, J. Y. (2024). Potential use of methane gas from the Villavicencio sanitary landfill, Colombia. Ingeniería y Competitividad, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v26i2.14019
12. Daelman, M. R. J., van Voorthuizen, E. M., van Dongen, L. G. J. M., Volcke, E. I. P., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2012). Methane emission during municipal wastewater treatment. Water Research, 46(11), 3657–3670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.024
13. Hristov, A. N., Bannink, A., Battelli, M., Belanche, A., Cajarville Sanz, M. C., Fernandez-Turren, G., Garcia, F., Jonker, A., Kenny, D. A., Lind, V., Meale, S. J., Meo Zilio, D., Muñoz, C., Pacheco, D., Peiren, N., Ramin, M., Rapetti, L., Schwarm, A., Stergiadis, S., Theodoridou, K., Ungerfeld, E. M., van Gastelen, S., Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R., Waters, S. M., & Lund, P. (2025). Feed additives for methane mitigation: Recommendations for testing enteric methane-mitigating feed additives in ruminant studies. Journal of Dairy Science, 108(1), 322–355. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25050
14. Spidle, H., Esquivel, J., Schaub, A., Janssen, J., & Ramirez, J. (2021). Smart methane emission detection system development (Final Report) (Technical Report DOE-SWRI-FE0029020-1). Southwest Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2172/1837550
15. Renfrew, D., Vasilaki, V., Nika, E., Tsalidis, G. A., Marin, E., & Katsou, E. (2024). Systematic assessment of wastewater resource circularity and sustainable value creation. Water Research, 251, 121141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121141
16. Linquist, B. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento-Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C. M., & van Kessel, C. (2015). An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Global Change Biology, 21(12), 5039–5053. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13068
17. Yagi, K., & Minami, K. (2021). Mitigation options for methane emissions from rice fields: A review. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 67(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2020.1865840
18. Wallace, R. J., Sasson, G., Garnsworthy, P. C., Tapio, I., Gregson, E., Bani, P., ... & Mizrahi, I. (2021). A heritable subset of the core rumen microbiome dictates dairy cow productivity and emissions. Science Advances, 7(22), eabg2932. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg2932
19. Scheutz, C., Kjeldsen, P., & Pedersen, G. B. (2021). Evaluation of methane oxidation in biochar-amended landfill covers. Waste Management, 119, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.015

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.