As the global energy landscape shifts toward sustainable sources, public discourse is often polarized by conflicting information. While renewable energy technologies, primarily solar and wind, have matured significantly, skepticism regarding their cost, reliability, and environmental impact persists. These misconceptions can influence policy decisions and public acceptance.
Image Credit: hrui/Shutterstock.com
To understand this complex subject, we must examine the data. This article identifies six common myths about renewable energy, explains the technical realities behind them, and presents research-backed real-world case studies.
Myth 1: Renewable Energy Is Prohibitively Expensive
The Analysis:
A decade ago, renewable energy was more expensive than fossil fuels and relied heavily on subsidies. However, this economic dynamic has been overturned due to economies of scale and technological efficiency. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency, the global weighted average cost of electricity from new utility-scale solar photovoltaics (PV) fell by 89 % between 2010 and 2022.1 In many regions, building new renewable capacity is now less expensive than the marginal cost of operating existing coal plants.
Case Study: The Texas Energy Market (ERCOT)
Texas provides a clear example of market-driven renewable adoption. The state’s competitive electricity market favors producers with the lowest marginal costs. Because wind and solar have no fuel costs, they bid into the market at near-zero prices.
A 2023 analysis of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) market revealed that renewable energy generation saved Texas consumers approximately $28 billion over 12 years by displacing more expensive fossil fuel generation.2
During the heatwaves of 2022 and 2023, solar power provided a critical supply during peak demand hours, mitigating price spikes that would have occurred had the grid relied solely on natural gas.
Myth 2: Renewables Cannot Provide Reliable Power Due to Intermittency
The Analysis:
The argument that solar and wind are "intermittent" is accurate regarding generation patterns, but misleading regarding grid reliability. Modern power grids no longer rely on a single generator to be active continuously; instead, they utilize a portfolio of diverse resources. Grid operators manage variability through accurate weather forecasting, geographic diversity, and increasingly, battery storage.3 "Baseload" is an operational concept utilized by coal and nuclear plants, but it is not a requirement for a reliable grid system if flexibility is prioritized.
Case Study: South Australia’s Grid Transformation
South Australia operates one of the world's most variable grids regarding renewable penetration. In recent years, wind and solar have met over 70 % of the state’s local electricity demand.3 Despite early concerns with stability, the grid has maintained reliability through the integration of the Hornsdale Power Reserve, a utility-scale lithium-ion battery. The battery provides Frequency Control Ancillary Services (FCAS), responding to grid fluctuations in milliseconds- far faster than traditional thermal generators. This demonstrates that intermittency is a manageable engineering challenge rather than a barrier to reliability.
Myth 3: A 100 % Renewable Energy System is Technically Impossible
The Analysis:
Skeptics often argue that a grid running entirely on renewables is physically impossible. While achieving the final few percentage points of a 100 % renewable grid presents challenges with long-duration storage, operating a major industrial economy with a high penetration of renewables is feasible. Modeling by international agencies confirms that a mix of wind, solar, hydro, and storage can meet demand without compromising stability.4
Case Study: The German Energiewende
Germany is an industrial powerhouse with a high energy demand for manufacturing. Through its Energiewende (energy transition) policy, the country generated nearly 52 % of its gross electricity consumption from renewables in 2023.4,5 Crucially, Germany has maintained one of the most reliable grids in Europe. The System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), which measures the average outage duration for a customer, is consistently lower in Germany than in the United States, which relies more heavily on fossil fuels. This suggests that the proportion of renewable energy is not the primary determinant of grid stability; rather, it is the quality of grid infrastructure and management.
Myth 4: Wind Turbines and Solar Panels Cause Excessive Environmental Harm
The Analysis:
All energy production results in environmental impact; the relevant metric is comparative harm. A common concern is that wind turbines threaten bird populations and that solar panels create unmanageable waste. While local impacts exist, data suggests they are statistically lower than the impacts of fossil fuel extraction and combustion.
Case Study: Bird Mortality Statistics
Research indicates that while wind turbines do cause bird fatalities (estimated at roughly 234,000 per year in the US), this number is a fraction of the mortality caused by other anthropogenic sources.6 For comparison, collisions with buildings kill nearly 600 million birds annually, and fossil fuel power plants kill millions indirectly through habitat alteration and pollution. Furthermore, conservation groups such as the Audubon Society support properly sited wind energy, noting that climate change, driven by fossil fuel emissions, threatens two-thirds of North American bird species with extinction.
Myth 5: Renewable Energy Is a "Job Killer"
The Analysis:
Transitions in the energy sector inevitably led to shifts in employment, with jobs in coal mining and oil extraction declining. However, the renewable energy sector is more labor-intensive per unit of energy produced than the highly automated fossil fuel industry. This results in a net increase in energy sector employment.
Case Study: U.S. Energy Employment Data
According to the U.S. Department of Energy’s 2023 United States Energy and Employment Report, the clean energy sector added over 114,000 jobs in a single year, accounting for more than 40 % of all total energy job growth.7 The solar industry alone employs more people in electricity generation than coal, oil, and natural gas combined. The data indicates that the transition is not erasing jobs but rather migrating them to different technologies, often with transferable skills for electricians and engineers.
Myth 6: Renewables Require Too Much Land
The Analysis:
Critics argue that solar and wind farms require vast amounts of land, potentially displacing agricultural land or wilderness areas. While renewables do have a larger surface footprint than a single natural gas plant, this comparison often excludes the land required for gas extraction (wells), pipelines, and waste disposal. Furthermore, renewable land use is often dual purpose.
Case Study: Agrivoltaics in the UK
Analysis by Carbon Brief noted that golf courses in the United Kingdom occupy more land than all the country's solar farms combined.8 More importantly, the concept of "agrivoltaics", co-locating solar panels with agriculture, is gaining traction. In the UK and France, sheep farms are increasingly integrating solar arrays. The panels provide shade for animals during extreme heat, while the land remains productive for farming. This dual-use approach demonstrates that energy production need not compete with food production; with proper planning, they can support one another.
Continue Reading: What are the Key Benefits and Challenges of Agrivoltaics?
Conclusion
The data surrounding renewable energy suggests that many common fears are rooted in outdated information or a lack of context. Costs have decreased substantially, grid reliability has been maintained in high-penetration regions, and environmental impacts are significantly lower than the status quo.
Although the transition to a sustainable energy system presents complex logistical and economic challenges, the primary barriers are political and infrastructural rather than technological.
By relying on empirical evidence rather than persistent myths, decision-makers can navigate the future of energy with greater clarity.
References and Further Reading
- International Renewable Energy Agency. (2023). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022. Abu Dhabi: IRENA. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Aug/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2022
- Texas Impact. (2023). The Impact of Renewables in ERCOT (2022 Q4 Update). Texas Impact. United States of America. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/9ydsmm2
- Australian Energy Market Operator. (2023). Forecasting approach – Electricity demand forecasting methodology. https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/files/electricity/nem/planning_and_forecasting/nem_esoo/2023/forecasting-approach_electricity-demand-forecasting-methodology_final.pdf
- Diesendorf, M., & Elliston, B. (2018). The feasibility of 100% renewable electricity systems: A response to critics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.042
- Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (ISE). (2024, January 15). Public electricity generation 2023: Renewable energies cover the majority of German electricity consumption for the first time [Press release]. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-media/press-releases/2024/public-electricity-generation-2023-renewable-energies-cover-the-majority-of-german-electricity-consumption-for-the-first-time.html
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (n.d.). Estimated human-caused bird mortality in the U.S. https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds
- U.S. Department of Energy. (2023). United States energy and employment report 2023. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Policy. https://www.energy.gov/policy/2023-us-energy-employment-jobs-report-useer
- Evans, S. (2022, August 16). Analysis: UK solar farms take up less land than golf courses. Carbon Brief. https://www.carbonbrief.org
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.