Posted in | News | Ecology

Missing Link in Palaeognath Evolution

Flinders researchers have studied the giant cassowary’s eating, breathing and vocal structures and found a surprising missing link between two vastly different birds thought to be each other’s closest relative, the small flights South American tinamou, and the New Zealand moa.

The current relationships between palaeognaths (the cassowary and close relatives) as determined from genetic data, with now, further support from morphological data. Image Credit: Phoebe McInerney

The iconic and colourful Australian cassowary, the second largest living bird, has been studied for hundreds of years. However, their solitary nature in the dense rainforests of northern Queensland has ensured that many fundamental aspects of these animals continue to elude scientists.

Researchers from Flinders University in South Australia recognised that the throat structures involved with breathing, eating and vocalising (the syrinx, hyoid, and larynx) were almost totally unknown. Using advanced scanning technologies, the team at Flinders University were able to 3D image these structures, looking in detail at the anatomy and comparing them to that of other closely related birds.

“Scanning lets us see details that we wouldn’t be able to otherwise, including the shapes of internal structures, without causing damage to them” says lead author on the paper, Flinders PhD candidate Phoebe McInerney.

The results have been published in the international journal BMC Evolutionary Biology.

The cassowary’s closest relative is the Australian emu, so it was no surprise that they showed many similarities in the throat region.

“What did surprise us though was that despite extensive variation in this region between cassowaries and other primitive birds, known as palaeognaths, the extinct New Zealand moa and the living South American tinamou were very similar,” said McInerney.

Recent analysis of DNA has concluded that moa and tinamou are closest relatives.  However, these results had been met with scepticism by some biologists:  the moa was huge and flightless, and the tinamou is a small, flighted partridge-like bird.

And so, for many years, morphological similarities between the moa and tinamou eluded scientists, and yet, hidden deep within the throat, in a structure historically ignored, the answers have been uncovered: “The morphology of the often-neglected larynx has shown to be far superior than the other anatomical traits biologists previously used to infer evolutionary relationships for this group”, says Associate Professor Trevor Worthy, a co-author on the study.

“The unexpected family tree for primitive birds based on genomic evidence is looking more and more convincing”, says Professor Michael Lee, another co-author.

The researchers conclude that despite being historically overlooked, it is important not to forget the small things when studying evolutionary relationships among birds.

The open access article, ‘The phylogenetic significance of the morphology of the syrinx, hyoid and larynx, of the Southern Cassowary, Casuarius casuarius (Aves, Palaeognathae)’ December 2019, by PL McInerney, MSY Lee, AM Clement and TH Worthy, has been published in BMC Evolutionary Biology (Springer Nature) Vol 19, Article 233 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1544-7

The cassowary is most closely related to the emu, followed by the elephant bird, kiwi, moa and then tinamou. All groups of palaeognaths evolved flightlessness and large body size independently from flighted ancestors which flew around the Southern Hemisphere to other countries.

A flighted ancestor of both moa and tinamou flew to New Zealand and South America, leading to their diversification into two distinct birds.  

Source: https://www.flinders.edu.au/

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.